Jan/09©Chris Farley
The Ideal School

Whenever I think about how to solve the world’s problems (as I do frequently, with limited success), I realize that education is the most important tools to combat a plethora of issues. On a national scale, proper education would have, I believe, prevented the sub-prime mortgage crisis. Part of the blame for the crisis falls to consumers who accepted loans they shouldn’t have and lived beyond their means because they didn’t understand basic economics. Voters’ susceptibility to the various misinformation campaigns in the recent election (particularly those perpetrated against then-Senator Obama) underline how better education might focus voters better on real issues.
Then I thought more specifically about schools. My school does many things right, but like most students, I’m constantly thinking of ways things could be better. I eventually want to be a venture capitalist and, assuming I’m wildly successful (which is admittedly a lot to hope), I figure that I want to donate money to education.
So what would be in my ideal school? It would be an independent school (public education, at least at the moment, is fraught with complications) and the facilities would be state-of-the-art. Schools with amazing facilities, however, are not unique.
The standards for both students and teachers would have to be stringent, but at the same time I believe that teacher salaries should be very high. The culture of standardized testing in public education has reduced teachers there to babysitters instead of trained professionals. The ideal school would pay teachers like pros because they are pros. All contracts would be year-to-year. In the time I was in public school, I saw far too many teachers who worked hard until they got tenure. Job security should be tied to job performance.
Students should also have tough academic requirements. Schools are responsible for creating well-rounded people, but academics should always be the primary focus. In addition to disciplinary measures, the school should expel students for failing to meet academic standards. Students shouldn’t live under the constant threat of being expelled, but there are a few students in my grade who clearly do not live up to basic standards of academics. In the ideal school, they would be given the chance to improve and, if they didn’t, they’d be expelled.
Of course, it should be difficult to get in to the school to begin with. Ideally, an entrance exam would not only cover the subjects that you need to study for, it would include problems that require reasoning. It’s more important that people know how to think than it is that they remember things, particularly in a time when information is so easily obtained. Oxford and Cambridge do this really well. Admissions should also be blind – students shouldn’t be admitted because they’re likely high donors.
As far as the curriculum goes, ethical and moral reasoning should be featured prominently. Independent schools attract wealthy families and produce the next generation of important people. It’s important that ethics is introduced very early on. There’s a class at Harvard called “Justice” that would ideally be the model for the Upper School ethics curriculum. I also believe that writing should be a big part of the curriculum. My school’s most glaring curricular failing is not having a good writing program. We simply do not do enough writing and we don’t do enough long writing. Students should have to write papers of considerable length frequently. The result of the lax writing program has been students viewing writing as traumatic and poor writing quality.
Those are the few building blocks of an ideal school that I was able to brainstorm in a few minutes. My observations and conclusions are based on my time in both public and independent schools. My ideal school is based on my current school which is as close to ideal as possible. That said, there are always improvements to be made.
Happy 2009 everyone,
CF
Leave a comment
No trackbacks yet.
3:04 am on January 6th, 2009
Okay, first off, Hi Chris, nice to see a new post! Second off, I wrote a wonderful comment (well, I thought it was wonderful
but either Safari or your blog refused to take the comment, sending me to a page other than your blog. Sigh. Well, I've returned using Firefox and will try again
I am going to attempt to disrupt your thinking about schools and be a devil's advocate, or rather, a student's advocate. By the time you are a successful venture capitalist, schools may have changed. Or perhaps, given how slow schools are to change, they will not have altered very much but you will be in a position to act as a catalyst. So here are some thing to consider…
- What about online schools?
- What about project based schools? (A few using this model already exist.)
- What about schools that offer more student choice in the design of the learning process?
- What about a school that focuses on teaching students about how they learn?
- What about a school that truly facilitates learning for multiple learning styles?
- What about a school with a more global outreach?
How would you design a school for the students of the 21st century?
Just some ideas to think about
Cheers,
Mrs B/aka Laurie
2:43 am on January 8th, 2009
Sorry about the Intense Debate mishap! It was probably only temporary, but let me know if it happens again. It should be fully compatible with Safari.
You raise some interesting points about different types of schools. I was actually having a discussion with one reader, Ron Adams, about some of these and my answer is I don't really know enough about all of the types of schools you mentioned to give a completely educated answer, but I do have a few conclusions:
1. Technology, though I didn't mention it, is hugely important and will be as we progress into a new era of education. That would certainly be a big part of the budget.
2. In-person education will remain important for the foreseeable future. We just haven't invented a way for people to have truly face-to-face interactions and participate in hands-on activities without being on-site.
3. I've always been interested in a school that allows for student choice in designing the curriculum, but I think that only a certain amount of leniency can be given. Independent study opportunities and a diverse choice of courses is certainly important, but I think there still must be an imposed structure.
4. With regards to learning style, I don't believe that the ideal school would try to cater to every learning style. This would be a school for people who are good with the lecture/drawing on board/interactive technology type learning, not necessarily people who need to do actually manipulate things and be extremely hands-on in every subject. This is the same with special needs kids and kids at a lower academic level – it's not that the school would discriminate, but the school simply would not have the resources to take care of special cases because their resources would be focused elsewhere. My idea is essentially an honors school, instead of an honors class.
Thanks for the comment,
CF
5:50 pm on September 2nd, 2010
As for your ideal school, it certainly ignores the class size, ongoing teacher training, resources and of course catering to students with multiple intelligences. Studies have shown that students who are graded in various areas are aware of their weaknesses and strenghts.